Category: astrology (Page 1 of 2)

Cycles and Time

Astrology is the art of cycles, understanding time and patterns is the basis of all of this. If you learn the cycles of the planets, you can make a lot of inferences about your life and projects just based on that.

The most basic of cycles is that of the Sun, every year returning (sorta of) to the exact position of our birth. We all understand birthdays, but what about other planets and their cycles?

  • Mars: takes about 2 years to cycle back into his exact position
  • Jupiter: takes about 12 years to cycle back.
  • Saturn: takes about 30 years, the dreaded Saturn Return.
    • Saturn spends about 2.5 years in each sign, creating some interesting half cycles too.
  • Rahu/Ketu: take about 18.5 years to return.

Jupiter

Taking Jupiter, every 12 years we cycle back. This can mean going back to the same situation, learning an important lesson, or getting over some old problem/trauma from around that time. For instance, now we could be dealing with something that we experienced around 2014 (12 years ago). Those 12 years also show mastery over a subject, gaining great knowledge about that subject.

Similarly, every 6 years we have an Opposition, or half cycle of Jupiter. This is usually where our projects and dreams are challenged in some form. We learn that things aren’t as easy.

Jupiter is my favorite tool for self-analysis, in this regard. The patterns are usually clear. Every 12 years a similar theme, or situation will arise. For instance, maybe in 2014 you were dealing with some kind of relationship drama, and now a similar one can appear. Maybe you were dealing with a project being leaked, and yet again you face similar backstage issues.

The 6 year Jupiter pattern has more of a reality check to it. Look at decisions (specially those enthusiastic ones) you made about 6 years ago. What did you get wrong? What did you get right? What could be better?

Again, a great tool for self-analysis.

Mars

The cycle of Mars is all about excitement, passion and force. The thing about Mars is the problem with passion, it always dies down. You can’t live on passion alone, you need something more solid to sustain you long term. Whether a relationship or a project, the passion will die down. The existence or lack of a more solid base will determine whether or not you keep going.

On that note, I take Mars as more of gauge. Anything 2 years or shorter is a Mars affair, or simply a passion. Anything longer than 2 years has proved to be more than just a passion.

When you are just getting started, everything is shiny and new. The novelty alone can keep you going. But once you get used to it, things will get harder and less appealing. You will have to connect with deeper qualities, or face the fact that all you had was excitement.

In a relationship, it can be the make or break point, where you either end it or take it to the next level.

Saturn

Saturn has quite a few cycles, the most important one being the Saturn Return. But I’d like to highlight a different one, easier to understand, which is an 8 year cycle. 8 is a number strongly related to Saturn, so symbolically, it fits well.

Math wise, Saturn takes about 2.5 years in each sign, so 8 years would put Saturn sitting square from the starting position. For instance, January 10th 2026 had Saturn at 2° Pisces, while January 10th 2018 had Saturn at 8° Sagittarius.

Squares represent conflict, movement and resolution. With Saturn being the planet of karma and hardship, this usually deals with a crooked solution of sorts coming up.

Mundane wise, this can be frequently seen. In 2018, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal with Iran. 8 years later, we are seeing yet again conflict related to this subject.

On a personal level, this can deal with people from the past coming back, sore subjects being brought up and conflict resolution with what happened 8 years ago. The most productive output of this transit deals with understanding a problem from the past, and making amends with it.

Rahu and Ketu

I’ve already discussed Nodal Returns and Inversions, so I’m not going to say too much here. To recap, the cycle of the nodes is about 18,5 years (Return), with a half cycle of about 9 years (Inversion). The Nodes deal with the Eclipses, which themselves tend to trigger mass events that change public consciousness and discourse.

For instance, I write this as Rahu transits at 9° Aquarius. About 9 years ago, at February 2017, Rahu was transiting at 9° Leo.

Rahu represents obsessions, so this half cycle shows opposing obsessions. Which can mean a disenchantment of sorts, getting tired of something. Mundane, many times, this deals with reversals of fortune.

Cycles, what to do?

I know all of this above can sound overwhelming, as I throw around so many dates. 2 years ago, 8 years ago, 12 years ago, 9 years ago, etc. In a way, there is no escaping this. It is a bit complicated, it requires a fair share of thinking and weighting multiple variables. It is what makes astrology hard, you are looking and judging multiple factors.

It is also why I detest anyone that, purposely, overcomplicates things with random buzzwords or fake exclusive concepts just meant to sell courses. Things are complicated enough on their own, there is no need to make your own complications.

To simplify this, I’d say just focus on Mars and Jupiter. Mars is energy and movement, as well as excitement. With a 2 year cycle, anything that loses your interest after about 2 years (or less) was a passion. Anything longer than this; 4 years, 8 years; becomes bigger than a passion. This is a great tool for judging the importance, or lack thereof, of something.

With Jupiter, I see the 12 year cycle as a birthday. Every 12 months, we have a birthday. With Jupiter, every 12 years we have a return, acting as the “birthday” of sorts for something. It is a time where we gain wisdom and knowledge. We can reevaluate things and have more clarity.

For instance, you might look back on a decision, a relationship or a path you chose. You now have more clarity of what was right, what was wrong and what was behind the superficial ideas you had at the time.

Book Review: “The Nakshatras Illustrated” by Marc Boney

My opinion summarized: Don’t buy it.

I’ve never done a book review before, so pardon my french and any possible errors. Also, if you want me to do other book reviews or recommendations, please leave a comment below.

I must have read, at least, ten books by Marc Boney. His books are not really books, but collections of essays, which is akin to me just dumping some of my blog posts and calling it a book. Still, I tend to like his books. They are informative, fairly good and interesting. But this is not the case with this one.

The proposal of the book is illustrating the nakshatras through birth charts, and explaining their meanings and expressions. An excellent idea. But with a subpar execution.

For most of the book, he is just quoting other authors, then giving basic explanations that add nothing of value. It is like reading someone’s kindle notes, instead of an actual book. Considering that, on his introduction, he specifically mentioned his goal of adding “something original and of value to the existing literature“, it’s a complete failure.

What’s the point of reading a book that is mostly a patchwork of quotes? Just read the original books from where the quotes came from. That’s my opinion.

Another trend in the book is pivoting. He will write shortly about the nakshatra in question, then spend the rest of the time discussing anything else in the chart presented. Yogas, other placements, dashas, really anything else. Except the subject of the book, which was supposed to be about nakshatras.

On the Ardra chapter, his Taylor Swift section is the most glaring example of this trend. He spends multiple paragraphs discussing the chart, her life, a special yoga there, what he thinks of her; and then he comments on Ardra as shortly as possible.

He mentions the stormy nature of her relationships, and how that turned into gold and success through her music, a typical Ardra theme. Thank god! By that point I thought he wasn’t going to say anything about Ardra, by the sheer amount of pivoting and stalling involved.

But more can (and should) be said, if your proposal is discussing nakshatras:

  • Ardra deals with controversy. Taylor, as any massive celebrity, is no stranger to this; facing criticism and backlash. Her VMA’s episode with Kanye West was both an example of controversy, and the Ardra trend to turn tears into gold, as her career only rose after that event.
  • Ardra is witty, cutting, provocative and kinda sarcastic. Her style of writing, mocking her detractors or rivals illustrates that tendency.
  • Ardra deals with a strong sense of justice, and this can harbor a desire to “destroy” things or people they deem unfair. Her conflict with the industry, and powerful players, about her masters is a great example of this.

Through countless other examples, it feels as if nakshatras are just an excuse, as he talks mostly about other chart factors and interpretation points. It sounds like he didn’t know what else to say about nakshatras, so he went into his comfort zone, focusing on his knowledge of yogas and other factors.

In other instances, his examples are just kinda bland and boring. His Purva Bhadrapada chapter was that for me. I like my weird examples, and this nakshatra has a lot of them. Dozens and dozens of interesting, weird and bizarre stories. What did he choose? A movie star and some woman he watches on TV. Boring, I want to go home.


If you want a book on yogas and how to interpret a chart, this is an OK book. If you want a book on nakshatras, this is a bad book. He has the knowledge to back up an interesting book on interpretation, but that is not what he sold.

You can’t sell X, and deliver Y. If I randomly inserted a brownie recipe in this post, no matter how great my brownies are, it would be a bad post. I proposed a book review, I have to deliver a book review, not a brownie recipe.

Similarly, Boney proposed a nakshatra book, he delivered a collection of random interpretation points and yogas. It’s a bad book.

I wish he had named it “Secrets of the Nakshatras”, as it would align with my personal pet peeve about the word secrets always being followed by the most bland, cliché and common knowledge in astrology.

Anyway, I want my money back.

« Older posts

© 2026 Nexus Astrology

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑